Scarcely a
week has gone by since I put the VRW online in 1996 that I haven't
received at least one e-mail from someone--usually, but not always, a high
school or college student--claiming to be doing "research" on a
Victorian topic and asking me to recommend websites about that
topic. I always tell them the same thing: The Web is emphatically NOT the best place to find
the most substantial and reliable scholarly information about Victorian
Britain or any other historical subject. No matter where you begin on
even the very best websites, like George Landow's marvelous Victorian
Web, all
research roads lead straight back to the library, and it is there that
you're most likely to find what you're looking for. Ten minutes spent
looking up and reading the relevant entry in a thorough reference book
like Sally Mitchell's Victorian
Britain: An Encyclopedia will give you a much better start on almost
any Victorian research project than any number of hours spent browsing the
Web or dashing off e-mails to total strangers to ask for their help.
(A number of these works of reference are listed in the "Libraries and Bibliographies" section of the
VRW.)
Reference and subject-area librarians can also be of enormous help in finding
materials about your topic; this is, after all, their
profession. I
understand that not everyone lives near a good library, but that
doesn't mean that websurfing can somehow substitute for one--it can't.
If you're serious about exploring a topic, you'll have to make the effort
to find and read scholarly books and articles that deal with it.
This is not to say that the Web can't be a useful tool for
finding those materials, and primary sources as well. The
whole point of the Victoria Research Web is to help
researchers find the information they need, whether online or off, and other
websites listed here have similar aims. The Web has some wonderful
riches, some created by institutions and professionals, others gathered
together and made available by volunteer
enthusiasts. But it is not, and will
not be for the foreseeable future, a compendium of all human knowledge
or printed material, or
anything even close to that. In the end it is just one powerful
tool, and should never be the ultimate resort for a historical or
literary query, let alone for an entire project or piece of written work.
Doing "research" on
the Web alone for a historical research paper is like copying entries out
of an encyclopedia; it's not research at all, and it's certainly not
college-level work.
For all its richness the Web is also full of
incomplete and even completely mistaken and misleading
information, including sloppy and unreliable electronic
texts, tendentious sites with political or commercial
aims to push, nostalgia sites whose "information" is
mostly wishful thinking, and just plain slipshod
research. Finding your way to reliable sources through
all this dreck requires careful evaluation for pointers about how to do this.
But a person just beginning to look for information on a
topic rarely has enough background yet to make those
kinds of judgments. The best preparation for using the
Web and discussion lists as tools to enhance your
research, therefore, is to begin that research at your
local libraries, with the aid of a good librarian, who
can usually order books for you from other libraries if
necessary. You'll also find that the busy specialists
who inhabit lists like VICTORIA, for instance, will be
much more willing and able to help you if you've clearly
done some homework beforehand. Cruising the Web for
information is great fun, and often turns up some
promising leads, useful summaries, and interesting
sidelights if you use it sensibly, but by itself it
doesn't even begin to substitute for old-fashioned
research: hitting the books and sleuthing through the
documents.
Archives
| Libraries
| Trip
| Journals
| Lists
| Teaching